Bitcoin Futures Trading Commences; Implications for Funds and Registered CPOs and CTAs
The Chicago Mercantile Exchange (CME) and the CBOE Futures Exchange (CFE) on December 1, 2017 self-certified contracts for bitcoin futures products with the U.S. Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC).1 Additionally, on this date the Cantor Exchange self-certified bitcoin binary options.2 Subsequently, on December 12, 2017, the CFTC published a dedicated virtual currency resource Web page that the CFTC states will act as a central bank for “Commission-produced resources about virtual currency”.3 These events, together with other recent developments (such as PricewaterhouseCoopers’ November 30 announcement that it has accepted payment in bitcoin for its services),4 have further demonstrated the increasing acceptance of cryptocurrency into the financial mainstream. This Dechert OnPoint focuses on the two recently self-certified futures contracts, as a market in bitcoin futures did not previously exist.
CME and CFE Bitcoin Futures Contract Particulars
The CME bitcoin futures contracts, trading under the product code BTC, began trading on December 18, 2017. The CFE futures contracts, known as XBT futures, began trading on December 11, 2017, one week ahead of its rival exchange’s launch.
The two Chicago exchanges offer different contract specifications for traders, as well as different pricing methodologies. The CME will use an in-house reference rate eponymously named the Bitcoin Reference Rate (BRR), which aggregates trading information from several major bitcoin spot exchanges in order to derive a daily U.S. dollar price for bitcoin. The CFE will rely on the daily auction price from Gemini, a daily virtual currency exchange run by Cameron and Tyler Winklevoss, who have been involved in the bitcoin markets for several years. Both the CME and CFE bitcoin futures products will be cash-settled.
There are important differences in how the futures contracts are themselves structured.5 The BTC contracts will be traded in five bitcoin units as defined by the BRR. The underlier for the XBT contracts will be one bitcoin. Because the XBT contract will be one-fifth the size of the BTC contract, it will likely attract more non-institutional traders as it will provide less exposure and require posting much less margin to trade each contract. There are several indications that both the CME and CFE anticipate that bitcoin futures trading will be extremely volatile. Notably, as of the date of the publication of this Dechert OnPoint, the CME had set the initial margin rate for its bitcoin futures at 47% of the notional value of the contract, and the CFE had set the initial margin rate for its bitcoin futures at 44%.6 Initial margin is an up-front payment made by traders prior to entering into a futures contract trade. Initial margin is intended to cover losses in the event that maintenance margin (also known as variation margin) which is posted daily, is not adequate to cover losses. Both of these margin rates are far in excess of initial margin rates for other futures contracts, which usually work out to being set somewhere between 1% and 10% of notional value, or 110% of maintenance margin. Prior to trading beginning in both contracts and in response to volatility in the underlying bitcoin markets, the CME and CFE each raised the initial margin amounts by a substantial amount from the amounts they had originally planned to require. The Options Clearing Corporation will be clearing the XBT contract traded on CFE, while CME will clear its own contract.
As another indication of expected volatility, the CME has placed a tiered-price limitation system on both the up and down side. There is a hard 20% price fluctuation limit in both directions from a reference price, outside of which trading will not be permitted. If the market hits a 7% initial price limit, a two-minute cooling off period will occur, followed by a two-minute halt in trading. If trading remains at the 7% price fluctuation limit at the end of the two-minute cool-down period, the market will reopen at the 13% price fluctuation limit with a similar two-minute cooling-off and a further two-minute temporary halt mechanism, before opening a third time at the 20% price fluctuation limit. Trading is not permitted outside of this 20% limit.
As an indication that the exchanges and the CFTC plan to closely monitor bitcoin futures trading, the reportable levels for each exchange’s bitcoin futures contracts are set very low. The CFE has set a reportable position level of five contracts for its XBT product. The CME has applied a reportable level of one contract. Setting the reportable level at five or even one contract means that the exchanges and the CFTC can identify an investor trading a small number of contracts as a “large trader,” and request additional information with respect to the trader.7 To compare the CME and CFE bitcoin reportable levels to existing futures trading, CFTC and exchange-set reportable levels for other futures contracts are generally set anywhere between 25 and several thousand contracts.8
Below is a table summarizing key similarities and differences between the BTC and XBT products:
Bitcoin Futures Contract Product Code
Commencement of Trading
CME: December 18, 2017
CFE: December 11, 2017
Pricing Methodology Proprietary
CME: Bitcoin Reference Rate (BRR) system
CFE: Daily auction price from Gemini
CME: 5 bitcoin
CFE: 1 bitcoin
Block Contract Trade Minimum
CME: 5 contracts
CFE: 50 contracts
Minimum Price Intervals
CME: $5 per bitcoin (equal to $25 per contract)
CFE: $10 per contract
CME: 1 contract
CFE: 5 contracts
CME: 1000 contracts in the spot period
CFE: 1000 contracts in the spot period; 5000 contracts in all months combined
CME: 5000 contracts in single month; 5000 contracts in all months combined
Initial Margin Rate
The two Chicago-based exchanges are not alone in their fervor to launch bitcoin futures products. It has been reported that Nasdaq plans to launch bitcoin futures on its exchange, the Nasdaq Futures (NFX) in the first half of 2018.10
Implications for Registered Investment Companies
The launch of bitcoin futures trading has important implications for funds, including investment companies registered as such under the Investment Company Act of 1940 (registered funds). No publicly offered funds that provide exposure to bitcoin are yet available. A number of non-registered funds that would have traded on an exchange (ETPs) filed registration statements with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), but the SEC disapproved filings made by the exchanges that would have permitted those ETPs to list and trade.11 The commencement of bitcoin futures trading may address some of the concerns raised by the SEC in disapproving those filings. Further, those ETPs would have held bitcoin directly and would not have been registered funds for a variety of reasons, including because investment companies must hold at least 40% of their assets in securities,12 and the CFTC has determined that bitcoin itself is a commodity.13 Thus, funds that would hold a substantial amount of bitcoin would not be able to meet the 40% securities test to be classified as investment companies unless they also hold other assets that are securities. However, funds that would trade bitcoin futures would also hold cash and similar instruments (e.g., U.S. Treasuries) as margin for futures trades, thus allowing them to meet the securities test. A number of sponsors filed registration statements in recent months, prior to the commencement of trading in bitcoin futures, for registered exchange-traded funds (ETFs) and non-registered ETPs that would obtain exposure to bitcoin through futures contracts; some of those registration statements were withdrawn on the basis that such filings were premature due to the fact that bitcoin futures contracts were not yet available for investment. However, in connection with the recent commencement of bitcoin futures trading, a number of new registration statements for such ETFs and ETPs have been filed.
Implications for Registered CPOs and CTAs
After bitcoin futures trading began, on December 14, 2017, the National Futures Association (NFA) announced a new reporting requirement for registered commodity pool operators (CPOs) and commodity trading advisors (CTAs) that trade either or both the underlying virtual currency and virtual currency derivatives (which would include virtual currency futures, options and swaps) (collectively, virtual currency products). Effective immediately, upon commencing engaging in trading in virtual currency products in pools or accounts, registered CPOs and CTAs will need to update the portion of their annual questionnaire that addresses firm-level information which is located in the NFA online registration system (ORS), by clicking “Firm and DR Information” in the questionnaire index and answering the following questions, as applicable:
- Does your firm operate a pool that has executed a transaction involving a virtual currency (e.g., bitcoin)?
- Does your firm operate a pool that has executed a transaction involving a virtual currency derivative (e.g., a bitcoin future, option or swap)?
- Does your firm offer a trading program for managed account clients (other than a pool you reported under the CPO questions) that has engaged in any transaction involving a virtual currency (e.g., bitcoin)?
- Does your firm manage an account (other than a pool you reported under the CPO questions) that has executed a transaction involving a virtual currency derivative (e.g., a bitcoin future, option or swap)?
The NFA also announced that beginning with the first quarter 2018, registered CPOs and CTAs will be required to report the number of pools or accounts that executed transactions in virtual currency products during that calendar quarter. This reporting will be due to the NFA within 15 days of calendar quarter-end and will also be accomplished through the annual questionnaire.14
The launch last week of the CFE bitcoin futures contracts and this week’s launch of the CME’s similar futures contracts could have a number of ramifications for the markets, both long- and short-term. First, these futures contracts could allow for a wider base of investors to gain exposure to bitcoin and participate in this market where an understanding of cryptocurrency wallets, private and public keys and similar topics, while helpful, would no longer be necessary. Second, these launches and self-certified contracts, along with recent initiatives such as LabCFTC,15 could be a sign that the CFTC will be taking an increasingly leading role in integrating bitcoin into the overall U.S. regulatory regime. However, serious questions remain as to how the CME and CFE will need to adapt in the weeks and months to come as the market develops.
1) Fact Sheet, CFTC Backgrounder on Self-Certified Contracts for Bitcoin Products, (Dec. 1, 2018).
3) CFTC Launches Virtual Currency Resource Web Page. The actual web address for the CFTC’s virtual currency resource Web page is: cftc.gov/bitcoin.
4) Steven Russolillo, Bitcoin Goes to the Big Four: PwC Accepts First Digital Currency Payment, Wall St. J, (Nov. 30, 2017).
5) Contract Specifications, Cboe (last visited Dec. 13, 2017), Bitcoin Futures Contract Specifications, CME Group (last visited Dec. 13, 2017).
6) Bitcoin Futures Margins, CME Market Advisory No. 17-480 (Dec. 12, 2017); CFE Margin Update (Dec. 4, 2017).
7) The relevant information might be reported by the trader on CFTC Form 40 or by trader’s futures commission merchant on CFTC Form 102. Reporting to exchanges is done in accordance with exchange rules.
8) CFTC Rule 15.03(b). Exchange-set reportable levels are available in each contract’s specifications.
9) An accountability level is not a hard cap on the number of contracts a trader can hold, but holding that many contracts can prompt the exchange to ask questions about the trader’s strategy, and to subsequently set a position limit that applies only to that specific trader. 10) Stephanie Yang and Alexander Osipovich, Nasdaq Plans to Launch Bitcoin Futures in First Half of 2018, Wall St. J. (Nov. 29, 2017).
11) See Self-Regulatory Organizations; Bats BZX Exchange, Inc., Exchange Act Release No. 80206 (March 10, 2017) and Self-Regulatory Organizations; NYSE Arca, Inc., Exchange Act Release No. 80319 (March 28, 2017).
12) Investment Company Act of 1940, 15 U.S.C. § 80a-3(a)(1) (2012).
13) In re Coinflip, Inc., CFTC No. 15-29, 2015 WL 5535736, at *3 (Sept. 17, 2015). The SEC has not publicly taken a position on whether bitcoin is a security; however, bitcoin does not seem to meet the traditional tests used to determine whether an instrument is a security, and the market consensus is that bitcoin therefore is not a security. See SEC v. Howey Co., 328 U.S. 293 (1946) for a discussion regarding the factors that determine types of investments that constitute securities under SEC regulation.
14) Additional Reporting Requirements for CPOs and CTAs that Trade Virtual Currency Products, NFA E-Mail Notice to Members (Dec. 14, 2017). NFA members received this notice via e-mail, but as of the date of this Dechert OnPoint, the NFA had not posted the notice on its website.
15) See U.S. CFTC Takes Steps to Modernize Rules and Operations and to Reduce Regulatory Burdens, Dechert OnPoint (June 21, 2017).