Hong Kong Virtual Asset Fund Managers – Current State of Play
Introduction
The current regulatory requirements in Hong Kong with regards to managing funds that invest in "virtual assets" ("VA") can be summarized as follows – if an asset manager has a licence from the Hong Kong Securities and Futures Commission (“SFC”) to conduct Type 9 regulated activity (asset management) (“Type 9 Licence”) and that licensed manager intends to (a) manage funds (or portions of funds) that invest in VA and such investment is a stated investment objective; or (b) invest 10 percent or more of the gross asset value of its portfolio in VAs ("Criteria"), it would be required to apply to the SFC to “upgrade” its Type 9 Licence. At the time of writing, we understand that around 10 SFC asset managers have successfully "upgraded" their Type 9 Licence ("VA Fund Managers") – Dechert Hong Kong's market-leading team has involved in four of those VA Fund Managers with their upgrade applications.
“VA” are defined as digital representations of value, which take the form of digital tokens (e.g., digital currencies, utility tokens or asset-backed tokens); any other virtual commodities; and crypto assets or other assets of essentially the same nature, irrespective of whether they may be deemed “securities” or “futures contracts” as defined in the Securities and Futures Ordinance (Chapter 571 of the Laws of Hong Kong) (“SFO”).
As part of the application to “upgrade” its Type 9 Licence, a licensed manager would be required to enter into standard form terms and licencing conditions issued by the SFC, the “Proforma Terms and Conditions for Licensed Corporations, which Manage Portfolios that Invest in Virtual Assets”1 (“VA Fund Manager T&Cs”), with minor variations depending on the business model. The VA Fund Manager T&Cs are imposed on all upgraded VA fund managers and are substantially similar to the SFC’s Fund Managers Code of Conduct ("FMCC"), but adapted specifically for VA Fund Managers and business operations applicable to VA Fund Managers.
If a fund manager with a Type 9 Licence manages funds (or portions of funds) that invest in VA that do not meet either Criteria, the manager would not be required to "upgrade" its licence ("De Minimis Exemption"), but would nevertheless be required to notify the SFC of its intention to manage such VA funds and that it falls within the De Minimis Exemption.
VA Fund Managers responsible, or to which responsibility has been delegated, for the overall operation of a fund but who do not conduct discretionary account management are only subject to certain of the VA Fund Manager T&Cs.
VA Fund Managers that (i) conduct discretionary account management (in the form of an investment mandate or a pre-defined model investment portfolio) and (ii) receive management fees and/or performance fees as remuneration for managing the discretionary accounts ("VA Discretionary Account Managers") are subject to additional requirements that are set out in Appendix 1 of the VA Fund Manager T&Cs.
VA Fund Manager T&Cs – Summary of Key Terms
Summarized below some of the key responsibilities of VA Fund Managers under the VA Fund Manager T&Cs.
A VA Fund Manager should: | |
---|---|
General Principles |
|
Organization and Management Structure |
|
VA Fund Management |
|
Custody |
|
Operations |
|
Dealing with the Fund and Fund Investors |
|
Marketing Activities |
|
Marketing Activities Fees and Expenses |
|
Reporting to the SFC |
|
Additional Requirements Applicable to Virtual Asset Discretionary Account Managers
VA Fund Managers that are also VA Discretionary Account Managers are subject to certain provisions of the VA Fund Manager T&Cs relevant to discretionary account management, as well as additional requirements set out in Appendix 1 of the VA Fund Manager T&Cs.
Appendix 1 also sets out the following additional requirements applicable to VA Discretionary Account Managers: (i) minimum content requirements of discretionary client agreements; and (ii) the additional requirements that are summarized below.
A VA Fund Manager should: | |
---|---|
Target Clients |
|
Suitability |
|
Client Agreements |
|
Performance Review and Valuation Reports |
|
Contravention of the VA Fund Manager T&Cs is likely to reflect adversely on the fitness and properness of a VA Fund Manager or VA Discretionary Account Manager, and may result in disciplinary action by the SFC. The SFC has said it will adopt a pragmatic approach when implementing the VA Fund Manager T&Cs, taking into account all relevant circumstances, including the size of the VA Fund Manager or VA Discretionary Account Manager, as the case may be, as well as any compensatory measures implemented by their senior management.
Upgrade Application Process
A fund manager who is applying for a Type 9 Licence or an existing Type 9 Licence fund manager who wishes to upgrade its existing licence ("Upgrade Applicant") is required to inform the SFC if it plans to manage one or more funds that invest in VAs, subject to the De Minimis Exemption. Once it receives this information, the SFC will first seek to understand the Upgrade Applicant's business activities. If the Upgrade Applicant appears to be capable of meeting the expected regulatory standards, the proposed VA Fund Manager T&Cs will be provided to the Upgrade Applicant (where applicable) and the SFC will discuss them with the Upgrade Applicant and vary them in light of its particular business model so as to ensure that they are reasonable and appropriate.
In practice, an Upgrade Applicant will be required to complete a questionnaire that covers, among others, the considerations (set out below). This should enable the SFC to determine whether the Upgrade Applicant is able to comply with the VA Fund Manager T&Cs. Then there will likely be several rounds of questions and queries from the SFC on the responses in the questionnaire, often resulting in a call or meeting with the SFC. A successful Upgrade Applicant will then be required to agree and comply with the VA Fund Manager T&Cs, which will be imposed as a licensing condition.
From our experience and understanding from the market, this application process can take any time from six months to over a year, depending on various factors including the Upgrade Applicant's responsiveness, the complexity of the application and the proposed key terms of the funds, the ability to demonstrate the Upgrade Applicant's willingness and capability to comply with the VA Fund Manager T&Cs, amongst other things.
Key Upgrade Application Considerations
We have set out below some key considerations for an Upgrade Applicant when submitting its application. These are in addition to those set out in the VA Fund Manager T&Cs:
- Management Experience: Generally, similar to a traditional SFC licence application, one or more key personnel (ideally the existing or the proposed responsible officer of the Upgrade Applicant) should have three or more years of work experience in the relevant regulated activity, in this case, managing VA and VA funds (subject to some exceptions). It will be difficult to demonstrate the Upgrade Applicant's ability to properly manage VA funds in a regulated context without such experience.
- Trading Platforms: It is generally expected that all the counterparties of the VA fund and the VA Fund Manager, including the trading platform used by the VA fund for trading of VAs, should be appropriately regulated by an internationally recognized regulator in the relevant jurisdiction.
- Custodian: Similar to the requirements for trading platforms, a custodian of the VA of a VA Fund should be appropriately regulated by an internationally recognized regulator in the relevant jurisdiction. The Upgrade Applicant should also demonstrate that the proposed custodian has appropriate cybersecurity and financial ability to safeguard the VAs owned by the VA fund.
- Fund Administrator: Fund administrators that the VA fund proposes appointing should have sufficient experience, capability and expertise in dealing with similar VA funds. In particular, the administrator should have capability in dealing with valuation of VAs. Engaging an experienced fund administrator prior to the launch of the VA fund would help make the launch smoother, as the administrator would be able to provide practical advice in relation to the launch and the terms of the VA fund.
- Auditor: Similar to traditional fund administrators, the auditors that the VA fund proposes to appoint should have sufficient experience, capability and expertise in dealing with similar VA funds.
- Cybersecurity: Generally, the cybersecurity arrangement of the Upgrade Applicant should be upgraded such that it closes any gaps between the existing arrangement of the Upgrade Applicant and the terms set out in the VA Fund Manager T&Cs. Having an IT consultant would help identify and close any such gaps to ensure compliance, as well as ensuring that the VA Fund Manager, upon approval, is less susceptible to cybersecurity vulnerabilities and hacking in relation to its VAs.
- Types of Assets: At present, the VA fund terms that have been vetted by the SFC (as part of an Upgrade Applicant’s submission) have only allowed investments in coins, on a ‘long’ basis, with high liquidity and market capitalization, meaning that the investment universe is restricted. The market understands that there are VA funds that can also enter into certain derivative instruments with traditional financial instruments for leveraged transactions, hedging and shorting. We have also recently assisted a client such that their VA funds can engaging in staking with appropriately licensed platforms. It remains to be seen whether the SFC is ready to accept applications that propose investments in other types of instruments and with more "crypto-native" features, such as initial coin offerings, simple agreements for tokens (SAFT), VC-type funds, OTC derivatives and on-exchange derivatives with VA trading platforms (centralized or decentralized), non-fungible tokens (NFTs), redemption/ subscription in VAs, etc.
- Risk Management: The Upgrade Applicant should put in place risk management policies, process and procedures that are commensurate with the types of VA funds an applicant proposes to manage. For example, the risk management approach for an actively managed VA fund would be different (and likely more extensive) from that of a passively managed index tracking VA fund.
Conclusion
Looking at the developments of the Hong Kong laws and regulations in relation to VAs, including the VA Fund Manager T&Cs regime, it is encouraging to see that the Hong Kong Government has lived up to its pledge to open up the virtual asset industry to provide Hong Kong with a competitive edge as a virtual asset hub in the Asia region. Hong Kong has developed a wide array of licensing and regulatory regimes which allows VA industry players to navigate the market in confidence.