Diane Siegel Danoff


Diane Siegel Danoff


Philadelphia | Cira Centre, 2929 Arch Street, Philadelphia, PA 19104-2808
+1 215 994 2179 | +1 215 994 2222

| vCard | PDF

Diane Siegel Danoff concentrates her practice in intellectual property litigation. She has extensive litigation and counseling experience, developed during 30 years of practice, with trade secret, non-compete, trademark, patent, copyright, unfair advertising, and invasion of privacy matters. She has litigated cases covering highly sophisticated technologies such as medical devices, a variety of web-based technologies, specialty chemicals, financial services, and lasers, as well as various commercial litigation matters. Ms. Danoff frequently handles injunctions and, in one case in federal court, won a highly unusual award of attorneys’ fees at the temporary restraining order stage of the case.

Ms. Danoff has been named eight times as a leading litigator by Chambers USA, a referral guide to leading lawyers in the United States. Chambers has called her “superb, thorough and decisive” and “recommended for her courtroom skills.” In 2015, Ms. Danoff was named a BTI Client Services All-Star, recognized as one of 25 IP lawyers nationwide for excellence in client service and “having a deep awareness of the interplay between the complicated technical, legal and business issues facing IP clients.” Ms. Danoff is also listed in The Best Lawyers in America for Intellectual Property and Patent Litigation, and, in 2017, earned the "Lawyer of the Year" distinction for Trade Secrets law.

  • Amkor Technology, Inc. v. Synaptics Incorporated et al. Represent leading semiconductor packaging company in trade secret, copyright and patent litigation claiming over $90 million in damages.
  • ViaNY, Inc. v. S.F. Express (Overseas) Limited. Represented international package forwarding business in major copyright and trade secret lawsuit. Settled favorably to client.
  • WebMD Health Corp. v. Anthony Dale. Obtained preliminary injunction for WebMD following four-day evidentiary hearing in non-compete and trade secret case involving former high-level executive.
  • Synthes v. Globus Medical, Inc. Represented the plaintiff in a trade secret and Lanham Act case involving medical devices for the spine. Resolved by a US$13.5 million payment to our client (and an agreement not to solicit our client’s employees) following a two-week jury trial.
  • MetLife Life and Annuity Co. et al. v. Koresko et al. Represented MetLife in business method patent case and separate trade secret action involving a method of funding insurance products. Obtained complete victory before trial court which was affirmed on appeal.
  • Levy v. Kellogg Co. and Nintendo of America, Inc. Represented Kellogg Co. and Nintendo in trademark/unfair competition suit involving a Pokémon® promotion on Kellogg’s® cereal boxes. Settled favorably to our clients.
  • Anheuser-Busch Companies, Inc. v. Crown Cork and Seal Co., Inc. Defended “Rocket Docket” patent/antitrust suit involving aluminum can lids. Resolved by a Federal Circuit ruling for our client on certain counts and a settlement favorable to our client on the remaining counts.
  • Farm Journal v. Tribune Entertainment Co. Represented Tribune Entertainment in non-compete case involving nationally broadcast program. Defeated plaintiff’s preliminary injunction motion following full evidentiary hearing. After that ruling, plaintiff dropped the case without any settlement.
  • Brainware v. Kofax. Represented Kofax in a false advertising case filed pursuant to the Lanham Act, and in companion trade secret/non-compete case, in the “Rocket Docket” of the U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Virginia. Settled favorably to our client.
  • Bank of New York Mellon v. Kelly and CoreStates Capital Advisors. Represented Bank of New York Mellon in non-compete and trade secret litigation against former employee and investment advisory firm, in court and before FINRA. Settled favorably to our client.
  • Lifestyle Lift Holding, Inc. v. Kotler and WebMD. Defended WebMD in Lanham Act case regarding website publication. Settled favorably to our client.
  • Barilla America, Inc. v. New World Pasta Co. Represented the leading U.S. dry pasta maker in Lanham Act case involving our client’s Ronzoni®, San Giorgio®, Prince® and Creamette® packaging. Settled favorably to our client.
  • EverNu v. Rohm and Haas Co. Defending Rohm and Haas, which is part of the Dow Chemical Co., in a suit arising out of a trade secret misappropriation litigation. Obtained complete dismissal by trial court and currently defending appeal.
  • Walker v. WPIX. Defended WPIX-TV in invasion of privacy litigation involving Public Service Announcement. Obtained voluntary dismissal without settlement following discovery.
  • Harvard University, A.B., 1981, magna cum laude, Phi Beta Kappa
  • The University of Chicago Law School, J.D., 1984
  • Pennsylvania
  • Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
  • United States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
  • United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania
  • United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois
  • United States District Court for the Western District of Pennsylvania
  • Former sub-committee Chair of the American Bar Association’s committee on Trade Secrets and Interference with Contracts and the committee on Non-Compete Agreements
  • Former Chair of the Board of Philabundance, a non-profit that gathers surplus food for the needy in the Delaware Valley