Justin W. Aimonetti is an associate in Dechert’s trials, investigations, and securities group, focusing on trial and appellate matters and advising clients on complex legal issues. Mr. Aimonetti has experience representing individuals and corporations in federal court, as well as in numerous federal agencies and state courts. His experience touches on all parts of the litigation process.

Mr. Aimonetti has published numerous law review articles on a wide range of subjects. His scholarship has appeared in the Virginia Law Review, Yale Law Journal Forum, Stanford Law Review Online, the Pepperdine Law Review, and many other journals and reviews. Mr. Aimonetti has received several awards for his legal scholarship.

Before joining Dechert, Mr. Aimonetti served as an attorney-adviser in the Office of Legal Counsel at the Department of Justice, as a judicial law clerk to the Honorable Chief Judge Jeffrey S. Sutton on the U.S. Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, and as a judicial law clerk to the Honorable Carl J. Nichols on the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. In law school, Mr. Aimonetti contributed as an Articles Editor on the Virginia Law Review and participated in the Supreme Court Litigation Clinic.

    • Represented Walmart in a matter involving the District of Columbia’s Consumer Protection Procedures Act before the District of Columbia Court of Appeals. See Center For Inquiry, Inc., v. Walmart, Inc., No. 20-392 (D.C. 2022).
    • Represented the Competitive Enterprise Institute in a Freedom of Information Act request before the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia. See Competitive Enterprise Institute v. Gina McCarthy, et al., No. 21-1238 (D.D.C. 2022).
    • Represented a former Deutsche Bank commodities trader in a matter involving the wire fraud statute and the Speedy Trial Act before the United States Supreme Court. See James Vorley v. United States, No. 22-402 (2022).
    • Represented the American Action Forum in a matter involving the Communications Decency Act before the United States Supreme Court. See Reynaldo Gonzalez, et al., v. Google LLC, No. 21-1333 (2023).
    • Holmes v. Walton and its Enduring Lessons for Originalism, 106 Marquette L. Rev. 73 (2022)
    • Voigt Deference: Deferring to a State Agency’s Interpretation of a Federal Regulation, 106 Minn. L. Rev. Headnotes 100 (2021)
    • Race, Ramos, and the Second Amendment Standard of Review, 107 Va. L. Rev. Online 193 (2021)
    • The Founders’ Multi-Purpose Chief Justice: The English Origins of the American Chief Justiceship, 124 W. Va. L. Rev. 1 (2021)
    • Derivative Immunity as Savior from State Actor Status, 34 Regent Univ. L. Rev. 107 (2021)
    • Religion as Sword, but Not as Shield: Rectifying the Estrangement of Environmentalism and Religious Liberty, 22 Vermont J. of Env’t. L. 1 (2021)
    • How Two Rights Made a Wrong: Sullivan, Anti-SLAPP, and the Under-enforcement of Public Figure Defamation Torts, 130 Yale L.J. Forum 708 (2021)
    • Religious Exemptions as Rational Social Policy, 55 U. Rich. L. Rev. Online 25 (2021)
    • What’s the Buzz About Standing, 89 Geo. Wash. L. Rev. Arguendo 175 (2020)
    • Confining Custody, 53 Creighton L. Rev. 509 (2020)
    • ‘Magic Words’ and Original Understanding: An Amplified Clear Statement Rule to Abrogate Tribal Sovereign Immunity, 2020 Pepp. L. Rev. 1 (2020)
    • Colonial Virginia: The Intellectual Incubator of Judicial Review, 106 Va. L. Rev. 765 (2020)
    • Second Guessing Double Jeopardy: The Stare Decisis Factors as Proxy Tools for Original Correctness, 61 Wm. & Mary L. Rev. Online 35 (2020)
    • Disciplining the “Disruptive” Student Heckler, 72 Rutgers U. L. Rev. Commentaries 101 (2019)
    • Game Changer: Why and How Congress Should Preempt State Student-Athlete Compensation Regimes, 72 Stanford L. Rev. Online 28 (2019)
    • United States Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit, Honorable Jeffrey S. Sutton
    • United States District Court for the District of Columbia, Honorable Carl J. Nichols