UK Government to legislate on litigation funding to mitigate the effects of the 2023 Supreme Court decision in PACCAR

January 27, 2026

Key Takeaways

  • Much anticipated announcement from the UK Government confirms that it will be taking legislative action to “mitigate the impact of the 2023 Supreme Court judgment in PACCAR” and to “implement proportionate regulation of third-party litigation funding agreements”.
  • The UK Government signals that it may act on further recommendations in the Civil Justice Council report in the future.
  • This will ensure continued growth of class action litigation in the UK. 

On 17 December 2025, the UK Government announced in Parliament that it will be taking legislative action to mitigate the negative impact of the Supreme Court’s decision in PACCAR (R (on the application of PACCAR Inc and others) (Appellants) v Competition Appeal Tribunal and others (Respondents) [2023] UKSC 28) and to implement proportionate regulation of third-party litigation funding agreements. The Government’s rationale for legislating on this issue is that it will ensure fair access to justice and the competitiveness of the UK as a global litigation and arbitration hub.

The Supreme Court in the PACCAR case from July 2023 decided that litigation funding agreements which calculate funder return as a percentage of damages are likely to be unenforceable damages based agreements (“DBAs”), unless they comply with the Damages Based Agreement Regulations 2013 (see our previous OnPoint Funders Keepers: Growth in Litigation Funding in England Continues Despite Legal Challenges). Although there was a clear expectation that the Government would legislate in this area for access to justice reasons, the PACCAR decision caused uncertainty in the litigation funding market.

Accordingly, the Government’s announcement is not surprising, particularly in light of the recommendations made by the Civil Justice Council (the “CJC”) in their detailed Review of Litigation Funding published in June 2025.

The Government broadly accepted the two primary recommendations made by the CJC, namely:

  1. to introduce legislation clarifying that litigation funding agreements are not DBAs with prospective effect (i.e., overriding the PACCAR judgment with respect to any future litigation funding agreements); and
  2. to introduce proportionate regulation of litigation funding agreements.

The timing of any legislative changes and the nature and scope of the proportionate regulation are yet unknown. Nonetheless, this development will ensure the continued growth of class actions in England and Wales.

The CJC made 57 recommendations in total, many of which would benefit the litigation market as a whole. For example, the CJC recommended establishing alternative procedures for low value or small collective claims to safeguard businesses from a rise in funded actions.  The Government indicated that it will be looking at all other recommendations in due course.  

This is a hot topic which Dechert has been closely following along with other important issues in the mass torts/class actions world, please see our earlier OnPoints:

Related Professionals

Related Services

Subscribe to Dechert Updates